Abstract
Abstract
Background
Considering the increasing popularity of electronic learning, particularly smartphone-based mobile learning, and its reportedly optimal efficacy for instruction of complicated topics, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of smartphone-based mobile learning versus lecture-based learning for instruction of cephalometric landmark identification.
Methods
This quasi-experimental interventional study evaluated 53 dental students (4th year) in two groups of intervention (n = 27; smartphone instruction using an application) and control (n = 26, traditional lecture-based instruction). Two weeks after the instructions, dental students were asked to identify four landmarks namely the posterior nasal spine (PNS), orbitale (Or), articulare (Ar) and gonion (Go) on lateral cephalograms. The mean coordinates of each landmark identified by orthodontists served as the reference point, and the mean distance from each identified point to the reference point was reported as the mean consistency while the standard deviation of this mean was reported as the precision of measurement. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18 via independent sample t-test.
Results
No significant difference was noted between the two groups in identification of PNS, Ar or Go (P > 0.05). However, the mean error rate in identification of Or was significantly lower in smartphone group compared with the traditional learning group (P = 0.020).
Conclusions
Smartphone-based mobile learning had a comparable, and even slightly superior, efficacy to lecture-based learning for instruction of cephalometric landmark identification, and may be considered, at least as an adjunct, to enhance the instruction of complicated topics.
Trial registration number
This is not a human subject research. https://ethics.research.ac.ir/ProposalCertificateEn.php?id=33714&Print=true&NoPrintHeader=true&NoPrintFooter=true&NoPrintPageBorder=true&LetterPrint=true.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference46 articles.
1. Clair KL. A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innov High Educ. 1999;23(3):171–80.
2. Hunter S, Tetley J. Lectures. Why don’t students attend? Why do students attend. Melbourne: InHERDSA Annual International Conference; 1999. p. 12–5.
3. Bligh DA. What's the use of lectures? 5th ed. Eastborne: Intellect books, Anatonu Rowe Ltd; 1998.
4. Zitzmann NU, Matthisson L, Ohla H, Joda T. Digital undergraduate education in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093269.
5. Hendricson WD, Panagakos F, Eisenberg E, McDonald J, Guest G, Jones P, Johnson L, Cintron L. Electronic curriculum implementation at north American dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2004;68(10):1041–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2004.68.10.tb03851.x.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献