Factors influencing medical students’ approaches to learning in Qatar

Author:

Qureshi Sheila S.,Larson Adam H.,Vishnumolakala Venkat R.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study investigated the relevance of the revised 2-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) for exploring medical students’ approaches to learning in Qatar and identify how factors like gender, age, educational attainment, and prior experience with health care influence students’ adoption of deep approaches to learning.MethodsThe sample consisted of 108 medical students (44% male, 56% female) from all four years of medical school at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q). Participants completed the 20-item R-SPQ-2F questionnaire to measure their learning approaches through a structural model contrasting deep and surface learning. Participants also completed a survey collecting demographic information.ResultsStatistical analysis revealed significant differences in deep learning approaches across year levels for both men and women. Additionally, educational attainment played a significant role in students’ approaches to learning.ConclusionsBased on structural equation modeling, this cross-verification study supports the R-SPQ-2F instrument and offers additional evidence for its robustness and application to medical education. These findings may help educational and program leaders in Qatar better understand medical students’ learning approaches to enhance their pedagogical practices.

Funder

Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Qatar

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Corrigan O, Pinchen I. Tomorrow’s Doctors, a changing profession: Reformation in the UK medical-education system. In: Brosnan C, Turner BS, editors. Handbook of the Sociology of Medical Education. Oxon, UK: Routledge; 2009.

2. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc; 2010.

3. Marton F, Säljö R. On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I—Outcome and Process*. Br J Educ Psychol. 1976;46:4–11.

4. Marton F, Säaljö R. On Qualitative Differences in Learning—Ii Outcome as a Function of the Learner’s Conception of the Task. Br J Educ Psychol. 1976;46:115–27.

5. Biggs JB. Student approaches to learning and studying. 1. publ. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research; 1987.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3