Author:
Goins Emily C.,Coates Margaret,Gordee Alexander,Kuchibahtla Maragatha,Waite Kathleen,Leiman Erin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
While the importance of interprofessional education in medical training has been well-established, no specific framework has been used uniformly or shown to be most effective in the creation of interprofessional education (IPE) sessions. Further, prior studies have demonstrated that students have preferences for the design of these experiences. In this study, we sought to understand medical student preference for interprofessional teammates and motivations for this choice.
Methods
In this single-institution, cross-sectional analysis of the Duke IPE Clinic, participating students from September 2019–March 2020 completed a voluntary electronic survey that queried preferences for which health professions students (Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing (ABSN), Nurse Practitioner (NP), Pharmacy, and Physician’s Associate (PA)) they would want to work with, and the motivating reason. Preferences and reasons were compared between first-year medical students (MS1s) and third- and fourth-year medical students (MS3s/MS4s).
Results
In total, 132 students participated. We found that MS1s most preferred interprofessional teammates with a more similar area of study (PA, NP), whereas MS3s/MS4s most preferred classmates with a less similar area of study (pharmacy, DPT, ABSN). MS1 students frequently selected their first-choice preference because the profession seemed most similar, while MS3/MS4 students often selected their first-choice preference because the profession seemed most different.
Conclusions
Medical students earlier in training have more interest in working with professions they view as similar whereas senior students prefer to work with professions they view as more different. This information is important for designing educational IPE opportunities.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Jung H, Park KH, Min YH, Ji E. The effectiveness of interprofessional education programs for medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Korean J Med Educ. 2020;32(2):131–42.
2. Prentice D, Engel J, Taplay K, Stobbe K. Interprofessional collaboration: the experience of nursing and medical students’ interprofessional education. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015;2:2333393614560566.
3. Ateah CA, Snow W, Wener P, MacDonald L, Metge C, Davis P, et al. Stereotyping as a barrier to collaboration: does interprofessional education make a difference? Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(2):208–13.
4. Olde Bekkink M, Farrell SE, Takayesu JK. Interprofessional communication in the emergency department: residents’ perceptions and implications for medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:262–70.
5. WHO. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Presss. 2010 1st: Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?ua51. Accessed 31 May 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献