Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite substantial investment in step-free access at UK railway stations, persons with reduced mobility (PRMs) continue to travel less than their able-bodied counterparts and little is known about the value of step-free access. This research examines the benefits of step-free access and its relationship with rail usage among PRMs, and the wider benefits of railway station accessibility.
Methods
These issues are explored through a mixed methods approach. Semi-structured interviews with ten key organisations were undertaken, as was an analysis of Senior/Disabled Persons Railcard data from 17 railway stations in Buckinghamshire, each with varying levels of step-free accessibility.
Results
The results show that the benefits of step-free access extend beyond benefits at the individual level typically associated with those limited to PRMs, and demonstrate the potential to positively affect the society at large economically, environmentally, and socially. The findings also show a positive correlation between the level of step-free accessibility at a railway station and the percentage of PRMs using it.
Conclusions
This research argues that government and interested stakeholders should commit to expanding the number and coverage of step-free stations throughout the UK. They should ensure that the appraisal process for investment in step-free accessibility appropriately captures both user and non-user benefits.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Eesti Teadusagentuur
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference39 articles.
1. Accessibility Action Plan (AAP) (2017). A transport system that is open to everyone Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/638404/accessibility-action-plan-consultation.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2020.
2. Allen, J., Muñoz, J. C., & de Dios Ortúzar, J. (2019). Understanding public transport satisfaction: Using Maslow’s hierarchy of (transit) needs. Transp Policy, 81, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.005.
3. Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., & Njoya, E. T. (2020). Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: A thematic analysis study. Transp Res F, 73, 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.004.
4. Banister, D., & Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (2011). Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment. J Transp Geogr, 19(2), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.05.001.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献