Understanding user attitudes and economic aspects in a corporate multimodal mobility system: results from a field study in Germany
-
Published:2020-12
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:
-
ISSN:1867-0717
-
Container-title:European Transport Research Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.
Author:
Günther Madlen,Jacobsen Benjamin,Rehme Marco,Götze Uwe,Krems Josef F.
Abstract
AbstractThe present study aims to investigate user attitudes and behaviour when users interact with a corporate multimodal mobility sharing system, consisting of battery electric vehicles (BEVs), pedelecs (i.e. electric bicycles) and public transport. We analysed participants’ attitudes towards BEVs, pedelecs, public transport, and the underlying service tools, as well as the economic impacts of the whole corporate multimodal mobility system. Ninety-three participants took part in the 22 months long naturalistic driving study and used the corporate multimodal mobility sharing system for their business travel. The attitudes towards BEVs and the keyless access were evaluated as the most positive components, and usage behaviour was related to a more positive attitude towards pedelecs, public transport, as well as the keyless access and the booking tool. The economic evaluation revealed the possibility of significant reductions in mobility costs when integrating different means of transport into a smart multimodal mobility system. The findings may help fleet owners to further improve existing mobility concepts for corporate travel.
Funder
European Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Transportation,Automotive Engineering
Reference40 articles.
1. Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187. 2. Berglund, E., Lytsy, P., & Westerling, R. (2016). Active traveling and its associations with self-rated health, BMI and physical activity: A comparative study in the adult Swedish population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 11. 3. Born, B., Günther, M., Jähn, B., Müller, S., Scherer, S., Temmler, A., Teuscher, J., Götze, U., Heinkel, U., Krems, J. F., Schufft, W., & Wanielik, G. (2016). Connected Electromobility - between CO2 optimized energy management, user-centered design and cost effectiveness. 5. Conference on Future Automotive Technology, Munich, 03.-04.05.2016. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1319481/1319481.pdf 4. Born, B., Günther, M., Jähn, B., Müller-Blumenhagen, S., Temmler, A., & Jacobsen, B. (2019). ECoMobility – Connected E-Mobility. Vernetzte Elektromobilität am Beispiel der Technischen Universität Chemnitz. Chemnitz: Universitätsverlag Chemnitz. 5. Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Neumann, I., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2014). Is EV experience related to EV acceptance? Results from a German field study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25(A), 34–49.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|