Author:
Madison Suzanne,Colon-Moya Alex D.,Morales-Cosme Wilfredo,Lorenzi Margie,Diaz Aracelis,Hickson Bridget,Monteiro Kathy,Muniz Ruiz Alexander,Perez Addie,Redondo Richard,Reid Dennis,Robles Janet,Santiago Marsha,Thompson Opal,Wade Joyce,White Mary,Castillo Graciela,Valenzuela Cristian
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Despite a movement toward the inclusion of patient partners or advisors as part of the research team in all funded studies, few publications have discussed patient engagement from the patient partners’ perspective.
Methods
Qualitative interviews were conducted by independent qualitative researchers to collect and summarize the experiences and perspectives of the 16 Patient Partners (PPs) on the study team for PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief (PREPARE), a large, pragmatic study of 1200 African American/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) adults with asthma. This study was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Results
This paper, authored by the PPs themselves, summarizes qualitative interview findings. The journey of the PREPARE PPs began with a desire to learn more about asthma and advocate for other individuals with asthma. Many challenges, including intimidation and lack of trust, were overcome as the research team prioritized building a comfortable environment in which PPs’ lived experiences, opinions, and cultural beliefs are valued, and in which PP voices are centered and respected. Over time, the PPs gained confidence in expressing ideas and feedback, and in taking ownership of their role as valued members of the research team. The PP experience has had tremendous personal and professional impact on the PPs themselves, while also modeling a change in the way researchers and PPs relate to and partner with each other.
Conclusion
The partnership between PPs and researchers in the PREPARE study has elevated the PP role from external advisors to integral and empowered members of a collective research team, and the partnership developed and evolved over time.
Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference31 articles.
1. Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(12):1692–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x.
2. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
3. Food and Drug Administration. Patient engagement in the design and conduct of medical device clinical investigations; Draft Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders. Published September 2019. Accessed 5 July 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/130917/download
4. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Engagement Rubric for Applicants. Published June 6, 2016. Accessed 5 July 2021. https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf
5. Tembo D, Morrow E, Worswick L, Lennard D. Is co-production just a pipe dream for applied health research commissioning? An exploratory literature review. Front Sociol. 2019;4:50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献