Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study
-
Published:2023-11-28
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:
-
ISSN:2056-7529
-
Container-title:Research Involvement and Engagement
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Res Involv Engagem
Author:
Chudyk Anna Maria,Stoddard Roger,McCleary Nicola,Duhamel Todd A.,Shimmin Carolyn,Hickes Serena,Schultz Annette S. H.,Dalziel Sandra,Linkiewich Delane,Norris Lesley,Schreiner Kurt,Smith Kathy,Sumpton Janice,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The re-conceptualization of patients’ and caregivers’ roles in research from study participants to co-researchers (“patient partners”) has led to growing pains within and outside the research community, such as how to effectively engage patients in research and as part of interdisciplinary teams. To support the growth of more successful research partnerships by developing a shared understanding of how patient partners conceptualize and contribute to their role, this study aimed to explore patient partners’ motivations for engagement and understanding of their role.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants (n = 13) of an online survey of activities and impacts of patient engagement in Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research projects. Eligibility criteria included being a patient partner that indicated interest in interview participation upon survey completion, the ability to read/write in English and provide informed consent. Data were analyzed thematically using an inductive, codebook thematic analysis.
Results
Illuminating the lived/living patient and caregiver experience was central to how most patient partners conceptualized the role in terms of its definition, purpose, value, and responsibilities. Participants also identified four additional categories of motivations for becoming a patient partner and contributions that patient partners make to research that build upon and are in addition to sharing their lived/living experiences. Lastly, participants highlighted important connotations of the term patient partner, including temporal and context-specific considerations for the term “patient” and what “partner” may imply about the nature of the research relationship.
Conclusions
At the onset of partnership, academic researchers and patient partners must create the space necessary to discuss and understand each other’s underlying motivations for partnering and their perspectives on the purpose, value, and responsibilities of the patient partner role. These early conversations should help unearth what research partners hope to get out of and feel that they are able to contribute to engaging, and in such contribute to the development of reciprocal relationships that work towards shared and valued goals.
Trial registration Not applicable.
Funder
Patient-Oriented Research Awards - Transition to Leadership Stream award
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference44 articles.
1. Canadian institutes of health research. Health research in Canada and you [Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/43753.html#Health.
2. Canadian institutes of health research. Strategy for POR - patient engagement framework 2014 [Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html.
3. Tebes JK, Thai ND. Interdisciplinary team science and the public: steps toward a participatory team science. Am Psychol. 2018;73(4):549.
4. Salas E, Shuffler ML, Thayer AL, Bedwell WL, Lazzara EH. Understanding and improving teamwork in organizations: a scientifically based practical guide. Hum Resour Manage. 2015;54(4):599–622.
5. Wallerstein N, Calhoun K, Eder M, Kaplow J, Wilkins CH. Engaging the community: community-based participatory research and team science. Strategies for team science success: Springer; 2019. p. 123–34.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献