Author:
Elfassy Caroline,Wagner Lisa,Higgins Johanne,Montpetit Kathleen,Snider Laurie,Dahan-Oliel Noémi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Upper extremity (UE) involvement is prevalent in 73% of individuals with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC), yet no AMC-specific outcome measure exists. When developing a measure specific to a population with a rare musculoskeletal condition, clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives and involvement is a crucial and necessary step. This study sought to determine the most clinically useful items for an outcome measure of UE function for children with AMC as defined by caregivers and clinicians.
Methods
To ensure the perspectives and needs of caregivers of children with AMC and clinicians were considered in the development of the UE measure for AMC, a Nominal Group technique (NGT) with caregivers of children with AMC (phase 1) followed by a three-round survey with clinicians (phase 2) were carried out.
Results
Phase 1: Eleven individuals participated in the nominal group technique and identified 32 items. The most important items were Picking up an object (n = 11), Eating (n = 10), Reaching mouth (n = 10), Getting out of bed (n = 10). Phase 2: Invitations to participate to an online survey was sent to 47 experts in the field of AMC, 20 participants completed round 1, 15 completed round 2 and 13 completed round 3. Throughout the survey, participants were asked about movement required to screen the UE, essential domains to be included in the measure, establishing a scoring guide and identifying tasks associated with joint motion and position.
Conclusion
A preliminary version of an UE AMC-specific outcome measure was developed with the help of caregivers’ perspectives and expert opinions.
Funder
“Fond de recherche du Quebec – Santé” Doctoral Training for Applicants with a Professional Degree Award
“Fond de recherche du Quebec – Santé” Clinical Research Scholar Junior 1 Award
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Health Professions,Health (social science)
Reference30 articles.
1. Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason-Lai P, Vandall-Walker V. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2018 Feb 7 [cited 2019 Aug 9];16. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804082/
2. Chudyk AM, Waldman C, Horrill T, Demczuk L, Shimmin C, Stoddard R, et al. Models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research: A scoping review protocol. Res Involve Engagem. 2018;4(1):28.
3. Ruco A, Nichol K. Patient engagement in research and innovation: a new framework. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2016;47(4):290–3.
4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Government of Canada. Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Patient Engagement Framework [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Aug 12]. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html
5. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M, Jones D. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):1–74.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献