Affiliation:
1. City University of New York
Abstract
In the last several decades, some important studies, such as those by Christopher Lewis, Harald Krebs, William Kinderman, and William Rothstein, have explored alternatives to monotonality in tonal music. In this paper, I discuss the concept ofperemennost’(mutability), which addresses the same problem from a Russian perspective. Mutability is generally defined as a fluctuation between two diatonically related tonal centers, usually a third apart. However, this somewhat narrow definition does not capture the notion in all its richness; the concept of mutability evolved significantly over the course of the last century. I explore this concept in the writings of six twentieth-century Russian theorists: Boleslav Iavorskiĭ, Lev Mazel, Viktor Berkov, Igor Sposobin, Iuriĭ Kholopov, and Andrei Miasoedov.
Reference32 articles.
1. Bailey, Robert. 1985. “An Analytical Study of the Sketches and Drafts.” In Wagner, Richard,Prelude and Transfiguration from “Tristan and Isolde”, ed. Robert Bailey, 113–46. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
2. BaileyShea, Matt. 2007. “The Hexatonic and the Double Tonic: Wolf’s ‘Christmas Rose’.”Journal of Music Theory51, no. 2: 187–210.
3. Bazayev, Inessa. 2014. “The Expansion of the Concept of Mode in Russian Music Theory.”Music Theory Online20, no. 3.
4. Berkov, Viktor. 1948.Garmoniia Glinki[Glinka’s harmony]. Moscow-Leningrad: Muzgiz.
5. Carpenter, Ellon DeGrief. 1988. “The Theory of Music in Russia and the Soviet Union, ca. 1650–1950.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献