VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF “DEBRIEFING EXPERIENCE SCALE” IN SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF “DEBRIEFING EXPERIENCE SCALE” IN SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING

Published:2022-09-14 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2651-4575
Container-title:Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal
language:tr
Short-container-title:IDUHeS

Author:

USLU Yasemin¹,TÜZER Hilal²,BAŞAK Tülay³,KOCATEPE Vildan⁴,KANIĞ Merve⁵,ÜNVER Vesile⁵,KARABACAK Ükke⁵,İNKAYA Bahar²,YILMAZER Tuba²

Affiliation:

1. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ

3. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GÜLHANE SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ

4. İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

5. ACIBADEM ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

The most important phase of simulation-based learning is “debriefing”. The main purpose of a debriefing session is to have participants review their own performances and identify the attainments they achieved during the simulation. This study performed the validity and reliability test of the Turkish version of the “Debriefing Experience Scale”. The universe of the study consisted of students (N=303) from the Nursing Department of a university during the 2017–2018 academic year. Content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency reliability of the Debriefing Experience Scale were tested. The Cronbach’s alpha level of the scale was found to be 0.948 for “Experience with Debriefing” and 0.951 for “Importance of item”. The test-retest intraclass coefficient (ICC) was 0.999 (p

Publisher

Izmir Democracy University

Reference25 articles.

1. Alderman, J. (2012). Using simulation to teach nursing students and licensed clinicians obstetric emergencies. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 37(6), 394-400. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/NMC.0b013e318264bbe7.

2. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.

3. Burns, N., & Groves, K. (2003). Practice of nursing research (3th edition ed.): WB. Saunders Company, USA.

4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Statistics, Research Design, Spss Applications and Interpretation. In Data Analysis Handbook for Sciences. (pp. 100-350). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.

5. Cantrell, M. A. (2008). The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 4(2), e19-e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.06.006.