Use of different debriefing methods after in situ simulation with intensive care unit nurses

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe debriefing phase is the simulation phase where performance improves and learning occurs.AimThis study examined the effects of the learning conversation (LC)‐based, 3D (defusing, discovering and deepening) model‐based and unstructured debriefing methods on satisfaction and debriefing experience after in‐situ simulation among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses.Study DesignIn this randomized controlled experimental study, three debriefing methods were compared, according to which 119 ICU nurses were divided into the following groups: LC group (n = 38), 3D group (n = 40) and control group (n = 41). In‐ situ simulation was performed with an intensive care patient scenario. p < .05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe total Debriefing Experience Scale—Experience with Debriefing part scores were 89.76 ± 8.10 in the LC group, 88.90 ± 8.70 in the 3D group and 88.29 ± 7.28 in the control group. No significant difference was found in debriefing experience and satisfaction between the groups (p > .05), but a significant difference was observed in the LC group. The groups showed a homogeneous distribution regarding participant characteristics.ConclusionDebriefing experience and satisfaction do not differ between the methods.Relevance to Clinical PracticeImplementation of the simulation in the ICU in ‐ situ with ICU nurses is beneficial in obtaining a fidelity experience. Performing the debriefing application after simulation in line with the model supports the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) debriefing standards.