Neutral Tropical African CO2 Exchange Estimated From Aircraft and Satellite Observations

Author:

Gaubert Benjamin1ORCID,Stephens Britton B.2ORCID,Baker David F.3,Basu Sourish45ORCID,Bertolacci Michael6ORCID,Bowman Kevin W.7ORCID,Buchholz Rebecca1ORCID,Chatterjee Abhishek7ORCID,Chevallier Frédéric8ORCID,Commane Róisín9ORCID,Cressie Noel67ORCID,Deng Feng10ORCID,Jacobs Nicole3,Johnson Matthew S.11ORCID,Maksyutov Shamil S.12ORCID,McKain Kathryn1314ORCID,Liu Junjie7ORCID,Liu Zhiqiang15ORCID,Morgan Eric16ORCID,O’Dell Chris3ORCID,Philip Sajeev17ORCID,Ray Eric18ORCID,Schimel David7ORCID,Schuh Andrew3ORCID,Taylor Thomas E.3,Weir Brad1920ORCID,van Wees Dave2122ORCID,Wofsy Steven C.23ORCID,Zammit‐Mangion Andrew6ORCID,Zeng Ning24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory (ACOM) NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) Boulder CO USA

2. Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL) NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR) Boulder CO USA

3. Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA

4. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA

5. Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University of Maryland College Park MD USA

6. School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics University of Wollongong Wollongong Australia

7. Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA

8. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L’Environnement Institut Pierre‐Simon Laplace CEA‐CNRS‐UVSQ CEDEX France

9. Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences Lamont‐Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University Palisades NY USA

10. Department of Physics University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada

11. Earth Science Division NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA USA

12. National Institute for Environmental Studies Tsukuba Japan

13. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA

14. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Boulder CO USA

15. State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

16. Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego CA USA

17. Centre for Atmospheric Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India

18. NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory Boulder CO USA

19. Universities Space Research Association Columbia MD USA

20. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA

21. BeZero Carbon Ltd Gorsuch Place Senna Building, E2 8JF London UK

22. Department of Earth Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 1081 HV The Netherlands

23. School of Engineering and Applied Science and Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

24. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University of Maryland College Park MD USA

Abstract

AbstractTropical lands play an important role in the global carbon cycle yet their contribution remains uncertain owing to sparse observations. Satellite observations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) have greatly increased spatial coverage over tropical regions, providing the potential for improved estimates of terrestrial fluxes. Despite this advancement, the spread among satellite‐based and in‐situ atmospheric CO2 flux inversions over northern tropical Africa (NTA), spanning 0–24°N, remains large. Satellite‐based estimates of an annual source of 0.8–1.45 PgC yr−1 challenge our understanding of tropical and global carbon cycling. Here, we compare posterior mole fractions from the suite of inversions participating in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO‐2) Version 10 Model Intercomparison Project (v10 MIP) with independent in‐situ airborne observations made over the tropical Atlantic Ocean by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission during four seasons. We develop emergent constraints on tropical African CO2 fluxes using flux‐concentration relationships defined by the model suite. We find an annual flux of 0.14 ± 0.39 PgC yr−1 (mean and standard deviation) for NTA, 2016–2018. The satellite‐based flux bias suggests a potential positive concentration bias in OCO‐2 B10 and earlier version retrievals over land in NTA during the dry season. Nevertheless, the OCO‐2 observations provide improved flux estimates relative to the in situ observing network at other times of year, indicating stronger uptake in NTA during the wet season than the in‐situ inversion estimates.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Atmospheric Science,General Environmental Science,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The African Regional Greenhouse Gases Budget (2010–2019);Global Biogeochemical Cycles;2024-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3