Affiliation:
1. Institute of Geomechanics Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Beijing China
2. Department of Geological Engineering Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu China
3. Key Laboratory of High‐Speed Railway Engineering Ministry of Education Chengdu China
4. State‐Province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Spatial Information Technology of High‐Speed Rail Safety Chengdu China
Abstract
AbstractIn the comment, Cagnoli (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024799) disagrees with our experimental conclusion that the enhanced particle agitation related to the high magnitude basal fluctuating stresses contributes to the granular flow mobility. Instead, he argues that the slope‐break model used in our experiments prevents the granular flows from being as mobile as they could be. In this reply, we restate our viewpoints by further clarifying the experimental variables and evaluating the effects of the additional phenomena raised in our experiments. By considering the granular flow velocities before the slope‐break, a linear correlation between the depth‐average velocity and equivalent friction coefficient is established, indicating that an increasing flow mobility with decreasing fractal dimension D has already been initiated before the slope‐break. Thus, the slope‐break collision has no significant effect on the general trend of the flow mobility versus grain size and the positive correlation between stress fluctuation and granular flow mobility is still valid.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献