Developing, Testing, and Communicating Earthquake Forecasts: Current Practices and Future Directions

Author:

Mizrahi Leila1ORCID,Dallo Irina1,van der Elst Nicholas J.2ORCID,Christophersen Annemarie3ORCID,Spassiani Ilaria4ORCID,Werner Maximilian J.5ORCID,Iturrieta Pablo6ORCID,Bayona José A.5ORCID,Iervolino Iunio78,Schneider Max9,Page Morgan T.2ORCID,Zhuang Jiancang10ORCID,Herrmann Marcus7ORCID,Michael Andrew J.9ORCID,Falcone Giuseppe4ORCID,Marzocchi Warner7ORCID,Rhoades David3,Gerstenberger Matt3ORCID,Gulia Laura11,Schorlemmer Danijel6,Becker Julia12,Han Marta1ORCID,Kuratle Lorena1,Marti Michèle1ORCID,Wiemer Stefan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Swiss Seismological Service at ETH Zurich Zürich Switzerland

2. US Geological Survey Pasadena CA USA

3. GNS Science | Te Pū Ao Lower Hutt New Zealand

4. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) Rome Italy

5. School of Earth Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

6. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany

7. Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Naples Italy

8. IUSS – Scuola Universitaria Superiore di Pavia Pavia Italy

9. US Geological Survey Moffett Field CA USA

10. The Institute of Statistical Mathematics Tokyo Japan

11. Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Università di Bologna Bologna Italy

12. Joint Centre for Disaster Research Massey University Wellington New Zealand

Abstract

AbstractWhile deterministically predicting the time and location of earthquakes remains impossible, earthquake forecasting models can provide estimates of the probabilities of earthquakes occurring within some region over time. To enable informed decision‐making of civil protection, governmental agencies, or the public, Operational Earthquake Forecasting (OEF) systems aim to provide authoritative earthquake forecasts based on current earthquake activity in near‐real time. Establishing OEF systems involves several nontrivial choices. This review captures the current state of OEF worldwide and analyzes expert recommendations on the development, testing, and communication of earthquake forecasts. An introductory summary of OEF‐related research is followed by a description of OEF systems in Italy, New Zealand, and the United States. Combined, these two parts provide an informative and transparent snapshot of today's OEF landscape. In Section 4, we analyze the results of an expert elicitation that was conducted to seek guidance for the establishment of OEF systems. The elicitation identifies consensus and dissent on OEF issues among a non‐representative group of 20 international earthquake forecasting experts. While the experts agree that communication products should be developed in collaboration with the forecast user groups, they disagree on whether forecasting models and testing methods should be user‐dependent. No recommendations of strict model requirements could be elicited, but benchmark comparisons, prospective testing, reproducibility, and transparency are encouraged. Section 5 gives an outlook on the future of OEF. Besides covering recent research on earthquake forecasting model development and testing, upcoming OEF initiatives are described in the context of the expert elicitation findings.

Funder

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3