Affiliation:
1. Sorbonne Université LOCEAN‐IPSL CNRS/IRD/MNHN Paris France
2. Takuvik International Research Laboratory Université Laval and CNRS Université Laval Quebec City QC Canada
3. Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere Hokkaido University Hakodate Japan
4. Faculty of Fisheries Sciences Hokkaido University Hakodate Japan
5. Arctic Research Center Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan
6. Unité d'Océanographie Chimique Université de Liège Liège Belgium
Abstract
AbstractThe intensity and spectrum of light under Arctic sea ice, key to the energy budget and primary productivity of the Arctic Ocean, are tedious to observe. Earth System Models (ESMs) are instrumental in understanding the large‐scale properties and impacts of under‐ice light. To date, however, ESM parameterizations of radiative transfer have been evaluated with a few observations only. From observational programs conducted over the past decade at four locations in the Northern Hemisphere sea ice zone, 349 observational records of under‐ice light and coincident environmental characteristics were compiled. This data set was used to evaluate seven ESM parameterizations. Snow depth, melt pond presence and, to some extent, ice thickness explain the observed variance in light intensity, in agreement with previous work. The effects of Chlorophyll‐a are also detected, with rather low intensity. The spectral distribution of under‐ice light largely differs from typical open ocean spectra but weakly varies among the 349 records except for a weak effect of snow depth on the blue light contribution. Most parameterizations considered reproduce variations in under‐ice light intensity. Large errors remain for individual records, on average by a factor of ∼3, however. Skill largely improves if more predictors are considered (snow and ponds in particular). Residual errors are attributed to missing physics in the parametrizations, inconsistencies in the model‐observation comparison protocol, and measurement errors. We provide recommendations to improve the representation of light under sea ice in the ice‐ocean model NEMO, which may also apply to other ESMs and help improve next‐generation ESMs.
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Space and Planetary Science,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics,Oceanography
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献