Difference in Relative Paleointensity Recording Efficiency of Magnetic Mineral Constituents in a Sediment Core Off Chile

Abstract

AbstractProgress of relative paleointensity (RPI) estimations using marine sediments has greatly contributed to better understanding of the behavior of the past geomagnetic field. To enhance further the reliability of RPI estimations, we must overcome the problem that climatically induced variations of magnetic‐mineral assemblages in sediments may influence RPI records. Two major constituents of magnetic‐mineral assemblages in marine sediments are magnetofossils and detrital magnetic minerals, and the latter consists of silicate‐hosted magnetic inclusions and unprotected magnetic minerals. It is necessary to understand different RPI recording efficiencies among those constituents to tackle the problem, but previous evaluations were inconclusive. We studied this issue using a sediment core taken from the southeast Pacific Ocean. Rock‐magnetic investigations revealed that the magnetic mineral assemblage of this core during the last ∼900 Kyr is a mixture of low‐coercivity magnetofossils and middle‐coercivity detrital unprotected partially oxidized magnetite. Natural remanent magnetization versus isothermal remanent magnetization demagnetization diagram showed strong convex curvature, and RPI signals carried by the two components could be separated by calculating RPI from the gradients of 20–40 and 70–160 mT segments. We confirmed that RPI recording efficiency of magnetofossils is lower than that of detrital unprotected magnetites/maghemites. Because of the marginal overlap between the coercivity ranges of the two components, changes in their relative abundance do not influence RPI estimations. This condition is ideal for RPI estimations, and the resulted RPI curve closely coincides with that of the PISO‐1500 stack despite changes in the relative abundance of the two components.