Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Riverine and Coastal Flood Modeling

Author:

Jafarzadegan Keighobad12ORCID,Moradkhani Hamid12ORCID,Pappenberger Florian3ORCID,Moftakhari Hamed12ORCID,Bates Paul4ORCID,Abbaszadeh Peyman5ORCID,Marsooli Reza6,Ferreira Celso7ORCID,Cloke Hannah L.8ORCID,Ogden Fred9,Duan Qingyun10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Complex Hydrosystems Research University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA

2. Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA

3. European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reading UK

4. School of Geographical Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Princeton University Princeton NJ USA

6. Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken NJ USA

7. Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering George Mason University Fairfax VA USA

8. Department of Geography and Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK

9. NOAA‐NWS Office of Water Prediction Tuscaloosa AL USA

10. College of Hydrology and Water Resources Hohai University Nanjing China

Abstract

AbstractOver the past decades, the scientific community has made significant efforts to simulate flooding conditions using a variety of complex physically based models. Despite all advances, these models still fall short in accuracy and reliability and are often considered computationally intensive to be fully operational. This could be attributed to insufficient comprehension of the causative mechanisms of flood processes, assumptions in model development and inadequate consideration of uncertainties. We suggest adopting an approach that accounts for the influence of human activities, soil saturation, snow processes, topography, river morphology, and land‐use type to enhance our understanding of flood generating mechanisms. We also recommend a transition to the development of innovative earth system modeling frameworks where the interaction among all components of the earth system are simultaneously modeled. Additionally, more nonselective and rigorous studies should be conducted to provide a detailed comparison of physical models and simplified methods for flood inundation mapping. Linking process‐based models with data‐driven/statistical methods offers a variety of opportunities that are yet to be explored and conveyed to researchers and emergency managers. The main contribution of this paper is to notify scientists and practitioners of the latest developments in flood characterization and modeling, identify challenges in understanding flood processes, associated uncertainties and risks in coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling for forecasting and inundation mapping, and the potential use of state‐of‐the‐art data assimilation and machine learning to tackle the complexities involved in transitioning such developments to operation.

Funder

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Geophysics

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3