Abstract
This article presents a critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment (LRE). The article begins with a review of the origins of LRE in professional writings and law and moves next to a discussion of how LRE has been operationalized in terms of a continuum of residential, educational, and vocational services. Building on previous critiques of the continuum concept, the author presents seven conceptual and philosophical flaws or pitfalls in the LRE principle itself, especially when it is applied to people with severe disabilities. The author then argues that an uncritical acceptance of LRE may lead to the establishment of a “new” community-based continuum and takes the position that many leading writings in the field can be interpreted to legitimate this new continuum. The conclusion of the article supports an unconditional commitment to integration and briefly contrasts integration with LRE as a guiding principle for the design of services and support for people with developmental disabilities and concludes with a note on the importance of viewing concepts in historical context.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Health Professions,Social Psychology
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Battle Fatigue: Parents, Institutionalized Ableism, and the “Fight” for Inclusive Education;Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities;2024-06-22
2. My Lens My Influence;Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design;2024-03-29
3. A Case for Systems Change in Special Education;Remedial and Special Education;2023-07-03
4. Leisure and the Environment: An Ecological Perspective on Wellbeing;Exploring the Leisure - Health Nexus;2022-11-11
5. Hard LRE Choices in the Era of Inclusion: Rights and Their Implications;Journal of Disability Policy Studies;2022-08-17