Abstract
Grounded in the 2018 California Camp Fire context, this study explores how message framing in charitable appeals influences individuals’ donation intentions. A 2 (firstperson imagery perspective vs. third-person imagery perspective) × 2 (gain frame vs. loss frame) between-subject online experiment was conducted via Amazon’s MTurk. Results showed that gain/loss framing and imagery perspectives interactively influenced participants’ donation intentions. Specifically, when a message is lossframed, a first-person imagery perspective (“I lose”) message is more effective than a third-person imagery perspective (“they lose”) message in enhancing participants’ perceived issue relevance, induced empathy, and donation intention. In addition, when the message is framed with a third-person imagery perspective, a gain-framed (“they gain”) message is more persuasive than a loss-framed (“they lose”) message.
Publisher
Nicholson School of Communication, UCF
Reference60 articles.
1. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel;Batson;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1997
2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
3. BBC. (2018, November 16). California wildfires: Number of missing leaps to 631. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada46230927
4. Bosone, L., & Martinez, F. (2017). When, how and why is lossframing more effective than gain-and non-gain-framing in the promotion of detection behaviors? International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.15
5. Castaneda, M. A., Garen, J., & Thornton, J. (2008). Competition, contractibility, and the market for donors to nonprofits. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 24(1), 215-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm036
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献