Feasibility and Effectiveness of Self-Management Education and Coaching on Patient Activation for Managing Cancer Treatment Toxicities

Author:

Howell Doris12,Pond Gregory R.34,Bryant-Lukosius Denise345,Powis Melanie6,McGowan Patrick T.78,Makuwaza Tutsirai9,Kukreti Vishal10,Rask Sara11,Hack Saidah6,Krzyzanowska Monika K.612

Affiliation:

1. Princess Margaret Cancer Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

4. Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Medical Oncology & Cancer Quality Laboratory (CQual), University Health Network (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. School of Public Health & Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

8. Institute of Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

9. Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Toronto, Ontario, Canada

11. Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ontario, Canada

12. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background: Poorly managed cancer treatment toxicities negatively impact quality of life, but little research has examined patient activation in self-management (SM) early in cancer treatment. Methods: We undertook a pilot randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the SMARTCare (Self-Management and Activation to Reduce Treatment Toxicities) intervention. This intervention included an online SM education program (I-Can Manage) plus 5 sessions of telephone cancer coaching in patients initiating systemic therapy for lymphoma or colorectal or lung cancer at 3 centers in Ontario, Canada, relative to a usual care control group. Patient-reported outcomes included patient activation (Patient Activation Measure [PAM]), symptom or emotional distress, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to examine changes over time (baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months) within and between groups. We used general estimating equations to compare outcomes between groups over time. The intervention group completed an acceptability survey and qualitative interviews. Results: Of 90 patients approached, 62 (68.9%) were enrolled. Mean age of the sample was 60.5 years. Most patients were married (77.1%), were university educated (71%), had colorectal cancer (41.9%) or lymphoma (42.0%), and had stage III or IV disease (75.8%). Attrition was higher in the intervention group than among control subjects (36.7% vs 25%, respectively). Adherence to I-Can Manage was low; 30% of intervention patients completed all 5 coaching calls, but 87% completed ≥1. Both the continuous PAM total score (P<.001) and categorical PAM levels (3/4 vs 1/2) (P=.002) were significantly improved in the intervention group. Conclusions: SM education and coaching early during cancer treatment may improve patient activation, but a larger trial is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03849950

Publisher

Harborside Press, LLC

Subject

Oncology

Reference54 articles.

1. A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment;Reilly CM,2013

2. New drugs, new toxicities: severe side effects of modern targeted and immunotherapy of cancer and their management;Kroschinsky F,2017

3. A systematic review of emergency department use among cancer patients;Lash RS,2017

4. The predictive value of cumulative toxicity for quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during first-line palliative chemotherapy;Schuurhuizen CS,2018

5. The economic burden of toxicities associated with cancer treatment: review of the literature and analysis of nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, oral mucositis and fatigue;Carlotto A,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3