Author:
Matuschak G. M.,Pinsky M. R.,Rogers R. M.
Abstract
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may impair extrapulmonary organ function. However, the effects of PEEP on the liver are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that at a constant cardiac output (CO), PEEP does not induce changes in hepatic blood flow (QL) and parenchymal performance. In splenectomized, close-chested canine preparations (group I, n = 6), QL was derived as hepatic outflow using electromagnetic flow probes (QLemf), and hepatic performance was defined by extraction and clearance of indocyanine green (ICG). In a noninvasive model (group II, n = 7), the effects of PEEP on hepatic performance alone were similarly analyzed. Measurements were taken during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV1), after addition of 10 cmH2O PEEP to IPPV (PEEP1), during continued PEEP but after return of CO to IPPV1 levels by intravascular volume infusions (PEEP2), and after removal of both PEEP and excess blood volume (IPPV2). Phasic inspiratory decreases in QLemf present during positive-pressure ventilation were not increased during either PEEP1 or PEEP2. Mean QLemf decreased proportionately with CO during PEEP1 (P less than 0.05), but was restored to IPPV1 levels in a parallel fashion with CO during PEEP2. The ICG pharmacokinetic responses to PEEP were complex, with differential effects on extraction and clearance. Despite this, hepatic performance was not imparied in either group. we conclude that global QL reductions during PEEP are proportional to PEEP-induced decreases in CO and are preventable by returning CO to pre-PEEP levels by intravascular volume infusions. However, covarying changes in blood volume and hepatic outflow resistance may independently modulate hepatic function.
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Subject
Physiology (medical),Physiology
Cited by
108 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献