Validation of the doubly labeled water method using off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy and isotope ratio mass spectrometry

Author:

Melanson Edward L.12,Swibas Tracy1,Kohrt Wendy M.12,Catenacci Vicki A.1,Creasy Seth A.1,Plasqui Guy3,Wouters Loek3,Speakman John R.45,Berman Elena S. F.6

Affiliation:

1. Divisions of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado

2. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado

3. NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

4. Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

5. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

6. Los Gatos Research/ABB, San Jose, California

Abstract

When the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is used to measure total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), isotope measurements are typically performed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). New technologies, such as off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy (OA-ICOS) provide comparable isotopic measurements of standard waters and human urine samples, but the accuracy of carbon dioxide production (V̇co2) determined with OA-ICOS has not been demonstrated. We compared simultaneous measurement V̇co2 obtained using whole-room indirect calorimetry (IC) with DLW-based measurements from IRMS and OA-ICOS. Seventeen subjects (10 female; 22 to 63 yr) were studied for 7 consecutive days in the IC. Subjects consumed a dose of 0.25 g H218O (98% APE) and 0.14 g 2H2O (99.8% APE) per kilogram of total body water, and urine samples were obtained on days 1 and 8 to measure average daily V̇co2 using OA-ICOS and IRMS. V̇co2 was calculated using both the plateau and intercept methods. There were no differences in V̇co2 measured by OA-ICOS or IRMS compared with IC when the plateau method was used. When the intercept method was used, V̇co2 using OA-ICOS did not differ from IC, but V̇co2 measured using IRMS was significantly lower than IC. Accuracy (~1–5%), precision (~8%), intraclass correlation coefficients ( R = 0.87–90), and root mean squared error (30–40 liters/day) of V̇co2 measured by OA-ICOS and IRMS were similar. Both OA-ICOS and IRMS produced measurements of V̇co2 with comparable accuracy and precision compared with IC.

Funder

HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3