Impact of ventilation strategies during chest compression. An experimental study with clinical observations

Author:

Cordioli Ricardo L.123,Lyazidi Aissam145,Rey Nathalie6,Granier Jean-Max1,Savary Dominique7,Brochard Laurent8910,Richard Jean-Christophe M.710

Affiliation:

1. University Hospital of Geneva, Intensive Care Unit, Geneva, Switzerland;

2. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil;

3. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil;

4. Laboratoire Rayonnement-Matière et Instrumentation, Département de Physique, Université Hassan 1er, Settat, Morocco;

5. Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Santé, Université Hassan 1er, Settat, Morocco;

6. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Rouen, France;

7. Emergency and Intensive Care Department, General Hospital of Annecy, Annecy, France;

8. Keenan Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

9. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

10. INSERM UMR 955, Creteil, France

Abstract

The optimal ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unknown. Chest compression (CC) generates circulation, while during decompression, thoracic recoil generates negative pressure and venous return. Continuous flow insufflation of oxygen (CFI) allows noninterrupted CC and generates positive airway pressure (Paw). The main objective of this study was to assess the effects of positive Paw compared with the current recommended ventilation strategy on intrathoracic pressure (PIT) variations, ventilation, and lung volume. In a mechanical model, allowing compression of the thorax below an equilibrium volume mimicking functional residual capacity (FRC), CC alone or with manual bag ventilation were compared with two levels of Paw with CFI. Lung volume change below FRC at the end of decompression and PIT, as well as estimated alveolar ventilation, were measured during the bench study. Recordings were obtained in five cardiac arrest patients to confirm the bench findings. Lung volume was continuously below FRC, and as a consequence PIT remained negative during decompression in all situations, including with positive Paw. Compared with manual bag or CC alone, CFI with positive Paw limited the fall in lung volume and resulted in larger positive and negative PIT variations. Positive Paw with CFI significantly augmented ventilation induced by CC. Recordings in patients confirmed a major loss of lung volume below FRC during CPR, even with positive Paw. Compared with manual bag ventilation, positive Paw associated with CFI limits the loss in lung volume, enhances CC-induced positive PIT, maintains negative PIT during decompression, and generates more alveolar ventilation.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3