A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Author:

Shrimpton A. J.1ORCID,Brown V.23,Vassallo J.45,Nolan J. P.67ORCID,Soar J.8ORCID,Hamilton F.9ORCID,Cook T. M.7ORCID,Bzdek B. R.10ORCID,Reid J. P.10ORCID,Makepeace C. H.11,Deutsch J.11,Ascione R.1213ORCID,Brown J. M.8,Benger J. R.14ORCID,Pickering A. E.151ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience University of Bristol Bristol UK

2. Critical Care, South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust UK

3. Great Western Air Ambulance Charity Bristol UK

4. Institute of Naval Medicine Gosport UK

5. Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine Royal Centre for Defence Medicine Birmingham UK

6. University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School Coventry UK

7. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospital Bath UK

8. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine North Bristol NHS Trust Bristol UK

9. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit University of Bristol UK

10. School of Chemistry University of Bristol Bristol UK

11. Langford Vets and Translational Biomedical Research Centre University of Bristol UK

12. Translational Biomedical Research Centre University of Bristol Bristol UK

13. University Hospital Bristol Weston NHS Trust Bristol UK

14. Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences University of the West of England Bristol UK

15. Department of Anaesthesia University Hospitals Bristol and Weston Bristol UK

Abstract

SummaryIt is unclear if cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an aerosol‐generating procedure and whether this poses a risk of airborne disease transmission to healthcare workers and bystanders. Use of airborne transmission precautions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may confer rescuer protection but risks patient harm due to delays in commencing treatment. To quantify the risk of respiratory aerosol generation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans, we conducted an aerosol monitoring study during out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrests. Exhaled aerosol was recorded using an optical particle sizer spectrometer connected to the breathing system. Aerosol produced during resuscitation was compared with that produced by control participants under general anaesthesia ventilated with an equivalent respiratory pattern to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A porcine cardiac arrest model was used to determine the independent contributions of ventilatory breaths, chest compressions and external cardiac defibrillation to aerosol generation. Time‐series analysis of participants with cardiac arrest (n = 18) demonstrated a repeating waveform of respiratory aerosol that mapped to specific components of resuscitation. Very high peak aerosol concentrations were generated during ventilation of participants with cardiac arrest with median (IQR [range]) 17,926 (5546–59,209 [1523–242,648]) particles.l‐1, which were 24‐fold greater than in control participants under general anaesthesia (744 (309–2106 [23–9099]) particles.l‐1, p < 0.001, n = 16). A substantial rise in aerosol also occurred with cardiac defibrillation and chest compressions. In a complimentary porcine model of cardiac arrest, aerosol recordings showed a strikingly similar profile to the human data. Time‐averaged aerosol concentrations during ventilation were approximately 270‐fold higher than before cardiac arrest (19,410 (2307–41,017 [104–136,025]) vs. 72 (41–136 [23–268]) particles.l‐1, p = 0.008). The porcine model also confirmed that both defibrillation and chest compressions generate high concentrations of aerosol independent of, but synergistic with, ventilation. In conclusion, multiple components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation generate high concentrations of respiratory aerosol. We recommend that airborne transmission precautions are warranted in the setting of high‐risk pathogens, until the airway is secured with an airway device and breathing system with a filter.

Funder

British Heart Foundation

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

European Resuscitation Council

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. 2021 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19

2. 2022 Interim guidance to health care providers for basic and advanced cardiac life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19;Atkins DL;Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes,2022

3. COVID-19 in cardiac arrest and infection risk to rescuers: A systematic review

4. Resuscitation Council UK.Guidance: COVID‐19. 2022.https://www.resus.org.uk/library/additional‐guidance/guidance‐covid‐19(accessed 04/08/2023).

5. European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3