Cerebral blood flow velocity underestimates cerebral blood flow during modest hypercapnia and hypocapnia

Author:

Coverdale Nicole S.1,Gati Joseph S.2,Opalevych Oksana2,Perrotta Amanda1,Shoemaker J. Kevin13

Affiliation:

1. Neurovascular Research Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;

2. Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; and

3. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

To establish the accuracy of transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) measures of middle cerebral artery (MCA) cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) as a surrogate of cerebral blood flow (CBF) during hypercapnia (HC) and hypocapnia (HO), we examined whether the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the MCA changed during HC or HO and whether TCD-based estimates of CBFV were equivalent to estimates from phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging. MCA CSA was measured from 3T magnetic resonance images during baseline, HO (hyperventilation at 30 breaths/min), and HC (6% carbon dioxide). PC and TCD measures of CBFV were measured during these protocols on separate days. CSA and TCD CBFV were used to calculate CBF. During HC, CSA increased from 5.6 ± 0.8 to 6.5 ± 1.0 mm2 ( P < 0.001, n = 13), while end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PetCO2) increased from 37 ± 3 to 46 ± 5 Torr ( P < 0.001). During HO, CSA decreased from 5.8 ± 0.9 to 5.3 ± 0.9 mm2 ( P < 0.001, n = 15), while PetCO2 decreased from 36 ± 4 to 23 ± 3 Torr ( P < 0.001). CBFVs during baseline, HO, and HC were compared between PC and TCD, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 ( P < 0.001). The relative increase from baseline was 18 ± 8% greater ( P < 0.001) for CBF than TCD CBFV during HC, and the relative decrease of CBF during HO was 7 ± 4% greater than the change in TCD CBFV ( P < 0.001). These findings challenge the assumption that the CSA of the MCA does not change over modest changes in PetCO2.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 289 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3