Affiliation:
1. Freie Universität Berlin , Division of Chemistry Education , Haderslebener Straße 9 12163 Berlin , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Language competences are still a powerful gatekeeper for many students in science learning. Popular approaches to integrating language and subject learning have attempted to make science learning more accessible to all students; however, empirical evidence for the effects of novel teaching approaches is still scarce. The Disaggregate-Instruction-Approach (DIA), which ‘disaggregates’ concept from scientific language learning, offers great potential to address an increasingly diverse population of students in science subjects and beyond. In this paper, we will present a comparative study with 228 public school students who either participated in a teaching intervention aligned with the DIA or designed in accordance with principles of language- and subject-integrated Scaffolding. The findings indicate that learners in both conditions reach substantial learning gains. However, students who received the DIA exhibit very similar learning growth scores regardless of their language proficiency whereas control group students reach a higher learning growth depending on their language competences.
Reference38 articles.
1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1406.5823
2. Bayraktar, S. (2001). A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Science Education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782344
3. Becker-Mrotzek, M., & Woerfel, T. (2020). Sprachsensibler Unterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache als Gegenstand der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. In C. Cramer et al. (Eds.), Handbuch Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung (pp. 98–104). UTB.
4. Bolte, C., & Pastille, R. (2010). Naturwissenschaften zur Sprache bringen. Strategien und Umsetzung eines sprachaktivierend naturwissen- schaftlichen Unterrichts. In G. Fenkart, A. Lembens, & E. Erlacher-Zeitlinger (Eds.), Sprache, Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften (pp. 26–46). StudienVerlag.
5. Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwis- senschaftler. Springer.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献