Affiliation:
1. JYU Open, University of Jyväskylä , P.O. Box 35 , , Jyväskylä , Finland
Abstract
Abstract
A major challenge for distance learning in higher education is supporting course completion. Counteracting completion risk factors requires investigating their significance across (non)completion stages. We tested the predictability of known risk factors at each completion stage. Not initiating was explained by available time, low motivation and completion methods. Abandonment was predicted by life situation and inappropriate completion methods. Failed submissions were explained by difficulty level and material availability. At early stages, supporting motivation by designing suitable course completion methods seems the most effective risk countermeasure. At later stages, academic skills protect from non-completion. Intrinsic motivation requires experiencing competence, autonomy and relatedness. Flexible distance learning methods with constructive, informational feedback and social interaction in the instructional design might best support course completion.
Reference74 articles.
1. Aho, S., Hynninen, S.-M., Karhunen, H., & Vanttaja, H. (2012). Opiskeluaikainen työssäkäynti ja sen vaikutukset. Työ-ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja, Työ ja yrittäjyys, 26. https://tem.fi/documents/1410877/3342347/Opiskeluaikainen+t y%C3%B6ss%C3%A4k%C3%A4ynti+ja+sen+vaikutukset+14062012.pdf
2. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
3. Aragon, S. R., & Johnson, E. S. (2008). Factors influencing completion and noncompletion of community college online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802239962
4. Asikainen, H., Hailikari, T., & Mattsson, M. (2017). The interplay between academic emotions, psychological flexibility and self-regulation as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281889
5. Aydin, S., Öztürk, A., Büyükköse, G. T., Er, F., & Sönmez, H. (2019). An investigation of dropout in open and distance education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 19(2), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.2.003