Challenges and opportunities of using a cooperative digital educational plan. Evaluation of the implementation

Author:

Walther Kathrina1,Fränkel Silvia2ORCID,Hennemann Thomas2ORCID,Hövel Dennis C.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Wuerzburg , Cologne , Germany

2. University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany

3. University of Teacher Education in Special Needs , Zurich , Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract The virtual school board (VSB) offers teachers a browser-based platform to support a multilevel, evidence-based educational plan. The present study examines teachers’ use of the VSB. Based on technology acceptance model (TAM), 17 teachers from nine schools were interviewed about their use of the VSB. The evaluation was based on qualitative content analysis (QCA). For seven categories the intercoder reliabilities were acceptable. After 24 months, the users said that they used the VSB for support planning, diagnostics, discussions with parents and other documentation. They rated the overview gained and the interdisciplinary exchange as beneficial. However, a lack of technical expertise within the staff, the technical equipment and the user interface hindered teachers, such that almost a fifth never used the software completely. The challenges are complex. Needless to say, missing, little or old technical hardware is likely to decrease the usage of a digital tool; the implementation also faces the challenges of recontextualisation, and additionally faces the resource-labelling dilemma. Therefore, these challenges must be dealt with in the mutual interaction between school practice, educational research and professional information and communication technology (ICT) development.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference46 articles.

1. Amrhein, B. (2016). Inklusion als Mehrebenenkonstellation. Anmerkungen zu Rekontextualisierungstendenzen in inklusiven Bildungsreformen. In B. Amrhein (Ed.), Diagnostik im Kontext inklusiver Bildung. Theorien, Ambivalenzen, Akteure, Konzepte (pp. 17–36): Klinkhardt.

2. Anni, C., Sunawan, & Haryono. (2018). School Counselors’ Intention to Use Technology: The Technology Acceptance Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 120–124.

3. Arhipova, S. V., & Sergeeva, O. S. (2015). Features of the information and communication technology application by the subjects of special education. International Education Studies, 8, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p162

4. Barrio, B. L., Carbonneau, K. J., Poppen, M., Miller, D., Dunn, M., & Hsiao, Y.-J. (2019). Theory to practice: Implementation achievements and challenges of response to intervention in a rural district. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, Fall 2019, 125–140.

5. Boger, M.-A. (2019). Die Methode der sozialwissenschaftlichen Kartographierung. Eine Einladung zum Mitfühlen – Mitdiskutieren – Mitdenken. Edition Assemblage.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3