Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina Charlotte [https://www.uncc.edu], 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 , United States of America
2. Ludwigsburg University of Education , Reuteallee 46, 71634 Ludwigsburg
3. University of Stuttgart , Allmandring 30a, 70569 Stuttgart
4. Ludwigsburg University of Education , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
With the increase in the number of online courses being offered, it is important for faculty to be prepared to teach online. In this study, we examine US and German faculty perceptions on their preparedness to teach online based on the perception of importance of teaching online competencies and their efficacy to teach online. We also examine factors (gender, age, country located, academic discipline, academic rank, method of teaching, years of teaching, years of teaching online and level taught) that are related to US and German faculty perception of the importance and efficacy of online teaching. Overall, the US faculty rated the competencies higher compared to the German faculty both in perception of importance and self-efficacy. Significant differences in the perception of the importance of competencies were noted based on gender, training, level taught, rank, and age. For self-efficacy, there were significant differences between the faculty in teaching format (synchronous, asynchronous or hybrid format), years of teaching online, and age. This study has implications for instructors who teach online, for instructional designers who offer professional development for online teaching and for administrators who support online learning at the universities.
Reference72 articles.
1. 1. Al-Azawei, A.; Parslow, P. & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126-146.
2. 2. Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(4).
3. 3. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
4. 4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
5. 5. Anderson, C. (2012). Barriers and enabler to teachers’ adoption of online teaching at an Australian University. Dissertation RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:160215
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献