Affiliation:
1. Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies , 2 Liela street , Jelgava , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
Beef production must combine the interests of both producers and consumers, taking into account the sustainable use of environmental resources. The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the slaughter results, meet chemical composition and pH value of three beef breeds – Aberdinangus (AA), Hereford (HF) and Limousin (LI) bulls. The bulls were fattened on Latvian and Lithuanian farms, mainly using grass forage.
The breed and age of bulls before slaughter significantly affected all slaughter results, except for fat class. From the meat chemical composition traits, the bull breed and age before slaughter had a significant effect only on the protein content. LI bulls showed the highest carcass weight 301.1±6.8 kg (p<0.05), dressing percentage 58.2±1.1% (p<0.05) and conformation score 3.56±0.18 points. The best fattened carcasses were obtained from AA bulls - 2.43±0.20 points. Muscle samples of musculus longissimus (M. longissimus) bulls of LI breed showed higher content of moisture (72.0±1.0%), protein (23.0±0.2%), ash (1.1±0.0%) and cholesterol (56.7±6.6 mg 100 g−1). AA breed bulls showed higher total fat (6.6±1.2%) and iron content (13.1±0.6 mg). The highest pH was observed in the meat obtained from AA bulls – 6.0±0.1, LI and HF breed bulls showed pH 5.8±0.0 and 5.8±0.1 respectively. Correlation analysis showed a significant, strong positive correlation between cold carcass weight and dressing percentage for AA and LI bulls, r=0.90 and r=0.88, respectively. For LI breed bulls, a strong positive correlation was also found between the cold carcass weight and the conformation score (r=0.98, p<0.01).
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference33 articles.
1. Adzitey, F., & Huda, N. (2011). Pale soft exudative (PSE) and dark firm dry (DFD) meats: Causes and measures to reduce these incidences – A mini review. International Food Research Journal, 18(1), 11–20.
2. Biesalski, H. K. (2005). Meat as a component of a healthy diet – are there any risks of benefits if meal is avoided in the diet. Meat Science, 70(3), 509–524. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.017.10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.017
3. Brugiapaglia, A., Lussiana, C., & Destefanis, G. (2014). Fatty acid profile and cholesterol content of beef at retail of Piemontese, Limousin and Friesian breeds. Meat Science, 96(1), 568–573. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.012.10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.012
4. Bures, D., & Barton, L. (2012). Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different ages. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57(1), 34–43. DOI:10.17221/5482-CJAS.10.17221/5482-CJAS
5. Cafferky, J., Hamill, R. M., Allen, P., O’Doherty, J. V., Cromie, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Effect of breed and gender on meat quality of M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum muscle from crossbred beef bulls and steers. Foods, 8(5). DOI:10.3390/foods8050173.10.3390/foods8050173