A comprehensive review of the diversion of children in conflict with law from judicial proceedings in Albania: Assessing alternatives to traditional justice

Author:

Peppo Etlon1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Lecturer at the Criminal Law Department Faculty of Law , University of Tirana Albania

Abstract

Abstract Diversion refers to the measures used for children in conflict with law without resorting to criminal prosecution or trial. Therefore, a child or a youth committing a criminal offense may be subjected to specific measures or programs other than the criminal prosecution and trial. Of course, different jurisdictions provide different legal requirements and conditions to be complied with when deciding to apply a diversion measure instead of prosecuting the child or the youth in conflict with law. In general, children in conflict with law who are under the age of 18 do usually benefit from the diversion measures when all the required conditions are fulfilled in accordance with the national Juvenile Justice Code. From the point of international law, the imposition of diversion measures for children in conflict with law may be considered as a legal obligation deriving from the United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Beijing Rules. In Albania, the diversion measures tend to divert children away from the formal proceedings and give priority to the restorative justice or other rehabilitation programs. This paper aims to provide a general overview of the diversion measures and their importance for the well-being of the children involved in criminal activities. The scope of the paper is focused on the diversion measures provided by the new Albanian Criminal Justice for Children Code with the aim to repair the harm caused by the offence and rehabilitate the children in conflict with law. In conclusion, the paper highlights the benefits of the diversion measures compared to punitive measures and traditional justice by providing such alternatives as the best way to promote the well-being of children in conflict with law and their inclusion in society.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference10 articles.

1. Kupchik, A. (2003). Prosecuting Adolescents in Criminal Courts: Criminal or Juvenile Justice? Social Problems, 50(3), 439–460.

2. Roberts, J. V. (2004). Public Opinion and Youth Justice. Crime and Justice 31. 495–542.

3. Serpas, R. W., & Merkl, T. A. (2020). Improve Juvenile Justice. In Ensuring Justice and Public Safety: Federal Criminal Justice Priorities for 2020 and Beyond (pp. 15–18). Brennan Center for Justice.

4. Soung, P. (2022). Is juvenile probation obsolete? reexamining and reimagining youth probation law, policy, and practice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973), 112(3), 549–591.

5. Mack, J. W. (1909). The Juvenile Court. Harvard Law Review, 23(2), 104–122.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions;European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences;2024-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3