Preliminary investigation and invalidity of investigative actions

Author:

Miha Elsa1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Prosecutor at the Prosecutor’s Office of the Judicial District of Tirana , Albania

Abstract

Abstract Time limits for preliminary investigation and it’s duration is part of the right to a regular legal process, provided for by Article 42 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania.1 The deadline of the preliminary investigation begins from the date that the name of the person whom the criminal offence is attributed to has been written in the register of notification of criminal offence and ends at the moment the investigations are completed with the relevant acts, the end of the investigations, etc. The duration of the preliminary investigations are different, depending on the prosecution, so in the general jurisdiction prosecution, the preliminary investigation period is 3 months and in the special jurisdiction prosecution it is 6 months. Extension of the preliminary investigation can be done periodically every 3 months, with a maximum term of 2 years, by the prosecutor of the concrete case. In addition to this 2-year period, the deadline can be extended by one more year by the General Prosecutor for the prosecutors of the general jurisdiction and by the Head of the Special Prosecution against Organized Crime and Corruption, for the prosecutors of this prosecution. The goal of the legislator who has set deadlines for the preliminary investigation is not only the completion of the investigation within a reasonable period, but also the legality, validity of all acts and the usefulness of all the evidence obtained during this period of the preliminary investigation. In this way, the legislator has disciplined the preliminary investigation and its validity. Thus, in order for the investigation to be valid, all evidence and procedural acts must be done within this validity period. But what happens if the investigative actions are carried out after the preliminary investigation period? What about the procedural acts that the prosecutor compiles at the end and beyond the deadline of the preliminary investigation, will they be valid and usable? These and other will be part of the analysis of this article.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference14 articles.

1. Constitution of the Republic of Albania.

2. Decision no. 29, dated 22.05.2015 of the Constitutional Court.

3. Decision no. 54 dated 31.03.2021, of the Criminal College of the Supreme Court.

4. Decision no. 67, dated 4.2.200 of the Criminal College of the Supreme Court.

5. Decision no. 00-2011-579 (101), dated 13.7.2011 of the Criminal College of the Supreme Court.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The change in the legal classification of the criminal offense and the right to defense in the trial;Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences;2024-07-01

2. Electronic evidence in the criminal process;Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences;2024-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3