SoK: Differential privacies

Author:

Desfontaines Damien1,Pejó Balázs2

Affiliation:

1. ETH Zürich / Google

2. CrySyS Lab , Dept. of Networked Systems and Services , Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Abstract

Abstract Shortly after it was first introduced in 2006, differential privacy became the flagship data privacy definition. Since then, numerous variants and extensions were proposed to adapt it to different scenarios and attacker models. In this work, we propose a systematic taxonomy of these variants and extensions. We list all data privacy definitions based on differential privacy, and partition them into seven categories, depending on which aspect of the original definition is modified. These categories act like dimensions: variants from the same category cannot be combined, but variants from different categories can be combined to form new definitions. We also establish a partial ordering of relative strength between these notions by summarizing existing results. Furthermore, we list which of these definitions satisfy some desirable properties, like composition, postprocessing, and convexity by either providing a novel proof or collecting existing ones.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference179 articles.

1. [1] Erfan Aghasian, Saurabh Garg, and James Montgomery. User’s privacy in recommendation systems applying online social network data, a survey and taxonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07629, 2018.

2. [2] Mohammad Alaggan, Sébastien Gambs, and Anne-Marie Kermarrec. Heterogeneous differential privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.06998, 2015.

3. [3] Joshua Allen, Bolin Ding, Janardhan Kulkarni, Harsha Nori, Olga Ohrimenko, and Sergey Yekhanin. An algorithmic framework for differentially private data analysis on trusted processors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.00736, 2018.

4. [4] Mário S Alvim, Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Anna Pazii. Metric-based local differential privacy for statistical applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01456, 2018.

5. [5] Fredrik Andersson, John M Abowd, Matthew Graham, Jeremy Wu, and Lars Vilhuber. Formal privacy guarantees and analytical validity of onthemap public-use data. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/47672, 2009.

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3