Inappropriate hemodialysis treatment and palliative care

Author:

Novotný Rudolf1,Novotná Zuzana2,Andraščíková Štefánia2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty hospital of J.A. Reiman in Prešov

2. University of Prešov , Faculty of Health Care

Abstract

Abstract The paper discusses inappropriate (futile) treatment by analyzing the casuistics of palliative patients in the terminal stage of illness who are hospitalized at the Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics of the Faculty hospital with policlinic (FNsP). Our research applies the principles of palliative care in the context of bioethics. The existing clinical conditions of healthcare in Slovakia are characteristic of making a taboo of the issues of inappropriate treatment of palliative patients. Inductive-deductive and normative clinical bioethics methods of palliative care and ethical strategy are applied for defining issues found in inappropriate hemodialysis treatment. An algorithm of hemodialysis treatment requires the definition of those lege artis criteria which, in the context of a patient’s autonomy and his/her decision, precondition the avoidance of the situation in which hemodialysis treatment is inappropriate (futile). Futile treatment in a terminal condition is ethically inappropriate medical treatment that extends the suffering of patients and their relatives. Its definition is determined by the relevant legislation and the methods of bioethics. An active palliative strategy is aimed at managing the process of incurable diseases in the patient’s bio-psycho-socio-spiritual continuity in the process of special bioethics. The global bioethical objective of general bioethics for palliative care is based on the paradigm of social harmony and solidarity in the context of an authentic modus of the patient’s existence as a constitutive principle for the phenomenon of the patient’s being to finite being (death).

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Education

Reference21 articles.

1. BROWN, E., MURTAGH, F. & MURPHY, E. (2012): Communication with patients and families. In: E. Brown, F. Murtagh & E. Murphy (eds.): Kidney Disease: From advanced disease to bereavement, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–224.

2. COUCHOUD, C., HEMMELGARN, B., KOTANKO, P., GERMAIN, M. J., MORANNE, O. & DAVISON, S. N. (2016): Supportive care: time to change our prognostic tools and their use in CKD. In: Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11, pp. 1892–1901.

3. Czech Society for Palliative Medicine (2013): Standardy paliativní péče 2013 [Palliative care standards 2013].[online] [Retrieved December 15, 2019] Available at: https://www.paliativnimedicina.cz/paliativni-pece-v-cr-v-roce-2013/

4. FIRMENT, P. (2015): Terminálna fáza ľudského života a poskytovanie zdravotnej starostlivosti z pohľadu práva [The terminal phase of human life and the provision of healthcare from the perspective of law]. In: Anestéziológia a intenzívna medicína (SOLEN), 4(2), pp. 75–77.

5. GRACE, B., HURST, K. & MCDONALD, S. (2012): ANZDATA 35th Annual Report 2012. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3