Triage of the elderly in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis as a bioethical process

Author:

Novotný Rudolf1ORCID,Novotná Zuzana2ORCID,Andraščíková Štefánia2ORCID,Firment Peter1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty hospital of J. A. Rayman in Prešov ( Slovakia )

2. University of Prešov ( Slovakia )

Abstract

Abstract The paper discusses the problem of triaging the elderly in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis by analyzing the triage process, caused by lack of resources, in Germany, Holland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. We apply inductive, deductive, and normative bioethical methods, comment on various recommendations for the indication of intensive care during a crisis, and discuss the utilitarianism of benefit maximization. As it follows from the evaluation of the elderly by the frailty parameter, medically inappropriate treatment, as a result of limited resources, is characterized by clinical and bioethical uncertainty. If the main bioethical objective of general bioethics for the COVID-19 pandemic is, in the case of limited resources, based on the non-utilitarian consequentialism paradigm, from the perspective of medical ethics, we face a borderline situation closely related to the topic of dying and death. Such a situation requires social, ethical, and professional reflection. An algorithm for intensive care indication in the situation of crisis and limited resources in the period of the pandemic requires a definition of criteria that identify an acceptable reason for abandoning the treatment in the context of the autonomy of the elderly and by respecting their human dignity and humanity. A global objective of general bioethics in the situation of the pandemic crisis should be based on the paradigm of social justice.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Education

Reference23 articles.

1. ČSARIM (2015): Zásady a principy pro přijímání pacientů na pracoviště intenzivní péče [Principles and guidelines for admitting patients to intensive care units]. In: Praktický lékař, 95(4), pp. 186–187.

2. ČSARIM (2020): Stanovisko výboru Českej spoločnosti anesteziológie, resuscitácie a intenzívnej medicíny ČLS JEP s názvom Rozhodovanie u pacientov v intenzívnej. starostlivosti v situácii nedostatku vzácnych zdrojov [Standpoint of the Committee of the Czech society of anesthesiology, resuscitation and intensive care of the Czech Medical Association JEP entitled decision-making for patients in intensive care in a situation of lack of rare resources]. In: Anesteziologie a intenzívní medicína, 31(5), pp. 249–255.

3. ČERNÝ, D. (2012): Euthanasie a etika (1. část) Preferenční utilitarismus Petra Singera [Euthanasia and ethics (Part 1) Preferential utilitarianism of Peter Singer]. In: Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky, 2(3), pp. 17–30.

4. ČERNÝ, D. (2018): Eutanazie a dobrý život: proč je eutanazie (někdy) morální [Euthanasia and the good life: why euthanasia is (sometimes) moral]. In: Vnitřní lékařství, 64(3), pp. 236–244.10.36290/vnl.2018.034

5. ČERNÝ, D., DOLEŽAL, A. & DOLEŽAL, T. (2020): Etická a právnívýchodiska pro tvorbudoporučení k rozhodování o alokacivzácnýchzdrojůpřiposkytovánízdravotníchslužeb v rámcipandemie COVID-19 [Ethical and legal bases for making recommendations for decision-making on the allocation of scarce resources in the provision of health services within the pandemic COVID-19]. Prague: Ústav státu a práva AV ČR, Kabinet zdravotnického práva a bioetiky.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3