The Individual Transport Mobility Gap (ITMG) as an Obstacle on the Road to Higher Rates of Public Transport Use

Author:

Bongard Stefan1

Affiliation:

1. Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society , Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Research purpose. The call for higher rates of public transport usage seems reasonable and understandable, given the growing impact of climate change and the high burden of heavy traffic, especially on urban transport structures. A course of Bachelor’s degree students in Logistics explored the issue of satisfaction with individual transport mobility, formulating the hypothesis that there must be a striking difference in the quality behind the use of a private car versus the use of public transport. The hypothesised difference in perceived quality between the two modes of transport was called the individual transport mobility gap (ITMG). Design/Methodology/Approach. The ITMG was considered from the perspective of people who mainly use a car (car users) and who mainly use public transport (public transport users). Both groups were asked how they rate their preferred means of transport and how they rate the alternative mode of transport using an online questionnaire. The survey can be accessed online at: https://fhludwigshafen.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6JOoxNvlSVxsdDv. Findings. The results of the study confirmed the hypothesis that there is a substantial perceived gap with an ITMG value of 4.0 between using a car versus using public transport for people who primarily use a car. In contrast, the ITMG value for public transport users was only 0.8. Originality/Relevance/Practical Implications. The originality of this approach lies in surveying satisfaction with a mode of transport at a highly aggregated level rather than at the level of individual quality factors, such as punctuality or flexibility. ITMG is defined in this study as a valuable metric that provides a basis for comparison. This quantitative metric can in turn be used to determine the effectiveness of measures to increase usage rates of public transport. The study also provides practical findings by making available its database to other researchers for further evaluation purposes. The study also contributes to scholarly and public discourse on how to effectively reduce the satisfaction gap in the use of private cars versus public transport, thus resulting in improved outcomes for the environment and society.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference28 articles.

1. Bain & Company (2011): Systematically inspiring customers. Results, (4), 3-5.

2. Berliner Morgenpost (2018). Busse liegen bei Ökobilanz deutlich vor Autoverkehr [Accessed 03.03.2020]. Available from Internet: https://www.morgenpost.de/berlin/article214667817/Busse-liegen-bei-Oekobilanzdeutlich-vor-Autoverkehr.html

3. BMVI (2020). Heute fahr‘ ich Öffis [Accessed 03.03.2020]. Available from Internet: https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Artikel/K/bundesmittel-oepnv.html

4. Brüggemann, H. & Bremer, P. (2015). Grundlagen Qualitätsmanagement: von den Werkzeugen über Methoden zum TQM. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.

5. Del Castillo, J. M., & Benitez, F. G. (2013). Determining a Public Transport Satisfaction Index from User10.1080/18128602.2011.654139

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3