The Efficacy of Two Phytogenic Feed Additives in the Control of Swine Dysentery

Author:

Nikola Delić1,Vladimir Drašković2,Jevrosima Stevanović2,Božidar Savić34,Nada Lakić5,Jasna Bošnjak-Neumüller6,Zoran Stanimirović2

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Animal Husbandry, Beograd–Zagreb , Autoput 16, Belgrade-Zemun , Serbia

2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , University of Belgrade , Bul. Oslobodjenja 18, Belgrade , Serbia

3. Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Serbia , Vojvode Toze 14, Belgrade , Serbia

4. Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture , University of Novi Sad , D. Obradovic square 8, Novi Sad , Serbia

5. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Agriculture , University of Belgrade , Nemanjina 6, Belgrade-Zemun , Serbia

6. Patent Co. DOO, Vlade Ćetkovića 1a, Mišićevo , Serbia

Abstract

Abstract Control of swine dysentery with antibiotics is often ineffective due to the resistance of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae. The potential of some herbal-based components against B. hyodysenteriae was previously studied in vitro. This study aims at the evaluation of in vivo efficacy of phytogenic feed additives in the control of swine dysentery The study involved 64 seven-week old weaned pigs allotted to 4 groups: two were fed on feed supplemented with either Patente Herba® or Patente Herba® Plus, the third received tiamulin (positive control), while the negative control was not given antibiotics or additives. Fecal consistency was recorded daily. The presence of B. hyodysenteriae in the feces was investigated weekly using microbiological assays and the PCR test. Weight gain and feed conversion ratio were calculated for each week, and for the whole experiment. B. hyodysenteriae was detected in all samples by both methods. The additives showed efficacy in the prevention and control of swine dysentery as only normal and soft stool was observed in the treated groups. By contrast, in the negative control all feces categories were detected. Frequencies of feces categories significantly differed (p<0.001) between feed-supplemented groups and the negative control. Efficacy of both additives in the prevention of SD is comparable to tiamulin, based on insignificant differences in the frequency of the various feces categories. Beneficial effects of both additives resulted in significantly (p≤0.05) higher weight gain and lower feed conversion ratio in comparison to the negative control. The average weight gains between additive-fed groups and tiamulin-treated group did not differ significantly.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Veterinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3