Didactic Capacity of Selected Czech and Russian Organic Chemistry Textbooks-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Didactic Capacity of Selected Czech and Russian Organic Chemistry Textbooks

Published:2019-12-01 Issue:1-2 Volume:24 Page:61-76
ISSN:2084-4506
Container-title:Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Karásková Natálie¹,Doležal Rafael¹,Maltsevskaya Nadezhda²,Kolář Karel¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences , University of Hradec Kralove , Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Králové 50003 , Czech Republic

2. State Budget Professional Education Institution , Kosygina 17(3), Moscow 119334 , Russia

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the results of analysis of Czech and Russian textbooks intended for organic chemistry teaching at upper secondary schools. In principle, the estimation of textbook didactic capacity is based on decomposition of the textbook content into a set of different objects and their subsequent frequency analysis. In this study, three Czech textbooks and three Russian textbooks were characterized by particular and total didactic capacity coefficients. The indifference of the calculated didactic capacities was tested by chi-square statistics at a level of significance α = 0.05. The results show that the selected Czech and Russian textbooks are not significantly different.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Ecology,Education,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/cdem-2019-0005

Reference34 articles.

1. [1] Baek E-O, Monaghan J. Journey to textbook affordability: An investigation of students’ use of a Textbooks at multiple campuses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2013;14:1-26. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237.10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1237

2. [2] Gurung RAR, Martin CR. Predicting textbook reading. Teach Psychology. 2011;38:22-8. DOI: 10.1177/0098628310390913.10.1177/0098628310390913

3. [3] Kim JHY, Jung HY. South Korean digital textbook project. Computers in the Schools. 2010;27:247-65. DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2010.523887.10.1080/07380569.2010.523887

4. [4] Sunarko V, Haro N, Sitorus IT, Sitorus P A, Saragih E. A content analysis of “Joyful” English textbook for Primary Grade II. JEE. 2019;4:77-88. DOI: 10.31327/jee.v4i2.1107.10.31327/jee.v4i2.1107

5. [5] Abd-El-Khalick F, Myers JY, Summers R, Brunner J, Waight N, Wahbeh N, et al. A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in U.S. high school biology and physics textbooks. J Res Sci Teach. 2017;54:82-120. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21339.10.1002/tea.21339

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. MENDELEEV’S PORTRAYAL AND MENDELEEVIAN EPONYMS IN CHEMICAL EDUCATION: SIC TRANSIT GLORIA MUNDI;Journal of Baltic Science Education;2024-04-20

2. Evaluation of Czech Non-Chemical Vocational School Chemistry Textbooks’ Text Difficulty;Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology;2021-12-01

3. A Comparative Analysis of Text Difficulty in Slovak and Canadian Science Textbooks;Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology;2021-12-01