Affiliation:
1. Riga Technical University , Institute of Power Engineering , 12-1 Azenes Str., Riga, LV-1048 , Latvia
Abstract
Abstract
As the EU countries are working on adapting the Electricity Directive to allow independent aggregation (IA) of demand response (DR) in all the electricity markets, this paper provides an assessment of potential benefits from DR in the day-ahead market, which has proven particularly challenging for the IA regulatory framework development. The model devised in this study uses data of the public wholesale market price curve from the Nord Pool power exchange to simulate market clearing results with introduction of certain amounts of DR that, via independent aggregation, competes alongside generation and is able to shift the supply curve. The simulated new market equilibrium point allows estimating price reduction capability of demand response, the total system-wide benefits, as well as analysing the potential remuneration mechanisms for independent aggregators and implications on their business models. While the results demonstrated a high value from DR during the peak hours, the overall benefits during average price periods were rather low, thus exposing the unpredictability of the revenue stream and questioning the business case for IA in the day-ahead market. The proposed approach can be used for further analysis of different IA compensation mechanisms, considering the system-wide benefits it brings to the wholesale market.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference26 articles.
1. 1. EU. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU. Official Journal of the European Union.
2. 2. Poplavskaya, K., & de Vries, L. (2018). A (not so) independent aggregator in the balancing market theory, policy and reality check. In 2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), (pp. 1–6), 27–29 June 2018, Lodz, Poland.
3. 3. Sadovica, L., Marcina, K., Lavrinovics, V., & Junghans, G. (2017). Facilitating energy system flexibility by demand response in the Baltics – Choice of the market model. In 2017 IEEE 58th International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University (RTUCON), (pp. 1–6), 12–13 October 2017, Riga, Latvia.
4. 4. Pöyry Management Consulting. (2018). Independent Aggregator Models. Final Report. Available at https://tem.fi/documents/1410877/3481825/Itsen%C3%83%C2%A4isen+aggregaattorin+mallit+26.6.2018/f63589df-49ea-4232-b39abb6973407fe2/Itsen%C3%83%C2%A4isen+aggregaattorin+mallit+26.6.2018.pdf
5. 5. de Heer, H., & van der Laan, M. (2017). USEF: Workstream on Aggregator Implementation Models. Available at https://www.usef.energy/app/uploads/2016/12/Recommended-practices-for-DR-market-design.pdf
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献