Affiliation:
1. BIAP/LOGOS-Departament de Filosofia , Universitat de Barcelona
Abstract
Abstract
Singular terms used in fictions for fictional characters raise well-known philosophical issues, explored in depth in the literature. But philosophers typically assume that names already in use to refer to “moderatesized specimens of dry goods” cause no special problem when occurring in fictions, behaving there as they ordinarily do in straightforward assertions. In this paper I continue a debate with Stacie Friend, arguing against this for the exceptionalist view that names of real entities in fictional discourse don’t work there as they do in simple-sentence assertions, but rather as fictional names do.
Reference105 articles.
1. Alward, Peter. 2011. Description, disagreement, and fictional names. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41(3): 423–48.
2. Asher, Nicholas. 2006. Things and their aspects. Philosophical Issues 16: 1–23.
3. Bertolet, Rod. 1984. On a fictional ellipsis. Erkenntnis 21: 189–94.
4. Boër, S.E.; and Lycan, W. 1986. Knowing Who. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Bonomi, Andrea. 2008. Fictional contexts. In Perspectives on Context, edited by P. Bouquet, L. Serafini and R. Thomason. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 213–48.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献