Comparative Antibacterial Activity and Quality Assessment of Essential Oils from Different Producers Against Oral Pathogens

Author:

Nagy-Bota Monica Cristina1,Nagy-Bota Stefan1,Suciu Bogdan-Andrei1,Halmaciu Ioana1,Man Adrian1,Pap Zsuzsanna1,Kovacs Monika1,Brînzaniuc Klara1

Affiliation:

1. “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology , Târgu Mureş

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the study is to evaluate antibacterial properties of commercial essential oils (Oregano, Black pepper, Coriander, Cinnamon) against oral pathogens (Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis). Nevertheless, we want to asses if the price of the essential oils (EO) which were purchased from 2 different retailers, can influence the quality of essential oil and the antimicrobial effect. Materials and methods: Essential oils from two different Producers (A-high price range, respectively B-low price range) with two opposite price ranges were purchased from local retailers. The inhibitory effect was assessed by disk diffusion. Bacterial inoculums of 0.5 McFarland units (~1.5 x 108 CFU/ml) were prepared from Streptococcus mutans Enterococcus faecalis. Muller-Hinton agar plates were inoculated with bacterial inoculums. Sterile paper disks with the diameter of 6 mm (Bioanalyse Ltd, Turkey) were dispensed on the medium surface. Five μl of essential oils were pipetted on corresponding disks. After 10 minutes (time needed for a proper diffusion of active components), the plates were incubated in normal atmosphere at 37°C. After 24 hours of incubation, the inhibition zone diameters (in millimeters) were read and noted in spreadsheet software, aside the average price in €/ml of essential oil. A cost-efficiency antibacterial activity index was also calculated.Results:With regard to EO from Producer A, the inhibition zone against Enteroccocus ranged from the weakest 14mm(Black pepper), 28mm(Coriander) to the strongest over 40 mm(Oregano and Cinnamon). With regard to volatile essential oils from Producer B, against the Enteroccocus, the smallest inhibition zone was observed for Coriander (10 mm), followed by Black pepper(11 mm); on the opposite side, the strongest inhibition zone presented both Oregano EO and Cinnamon EO (34 mm). Against S. mutans, the weakest inhibition zone showed Black pepper(6 mm), followed by Coriander EO(12 mm) and the strongest inhibition zone had Oregano EO(38 mm) and Cinnamon EO (40 mm). All the EO from the Producer A managed to successfully inhibit S. mutans growth. In both producers, Origanum vulgare EO was the most cost-efficient against E. faecalis (index=0.06 for Producer A and 0.03 for Producer B). In the case of Producer A, against S.mutans the best index was seen at Coriandrum sativum EO (0,05) and the weakest at Cinnamonum zeylanicum (0,14). In the case of Producer B, against E. faecalis, the lowest index was seen at Piper nigrum(0,13). The same pattern was seen against S. mutans, the highest index had Origanum vulgare(0,03) and the lowest Piper nigrum (0,23) Conclusions:Most of essential oils studied from both Producers, had better antibacterial effect against S. mutans compared to E. faecalis.All the EO from the Producer A managed to successfully inhibit S. mutans growth.The high price EO had a better antimicrobial effect compared to the low price EO.The strongest antimicrobial effect against E.faecalis had the high-price Oregano and Cinnamon EO and the weakest antimicrobial effect had low-price Coriander EO. Against S. mutans, the greatest efficacy had all high-price EO, and the lowest had the low-price Black pepper EO.The high price of some EO (Piper nigrum) does not make any difference regarding the antibacterial effect. Lower price EO may be still suitable in regards of antibacterial effect if considering the associated costs, even if the effect does not reach the potency of the higher-price alternatives.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3