Abstract
Abstract
What is the relation between the intentionality of states and attitudes which can miss their mark, such as belief and desire, and the intentionality of acts, states and attitudes which cannot miss their mark, such as the different types of knowledge and simple seeing? Two theories of the first type of intentionality, the theory of correctness conditions and the theory of satisfaction conditions, are compared. It is argued that knowledge always involves knowledge of formal objects such as facts and values, that emotions are reactions to (apparently) known values and that beliefs are reactions to known or apparently known facts or to the objects of relational states.
Reference29 articles.
1. Austin, J. L. 1961. Other Minds. In Philosophical Papers.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 44-84.
2. Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. 2003. Parsing Reward. Trends in Neuroscience26, 9: 507-513.
3. Correia, F. & Mulligan, K. 2007. Facts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, .
4. Engel, P. 2005. Truth and the Aim of Belief. Laws and Models in Science, ed. D. Gillies, 77-97.
5. Hossack, K. 2007. The Metaphysics of Knowledge.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献