Affiliation:
1. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi , Pathumthani , Thailand
Abstract
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to study the current situation and to compare the consequences of the Child Development Centre teachers on classroom action research-based instruction. The sample was 81 teachers of the Child Development Centre of the Local Administrative Organisation, derived from multi-stage random sampling. The instruments were the semi-structured interview form, and the measurement form of learning management outcomes, which the validity was between 0.80-1.00 and reliability was 0.968. The data were analysed by percentage, mean, standard deviation, content analysis and independent t-test. The results showed that 1) most teachers conducted informal classroom research to solve children’s behaviour problems and to increase the development of children. They usually utilised their research than others, but still not much. 2) the consequences of the classroom action research-based instruction were significantly higher than the standard requirement instruction at the .05 level of significance. The outstanding results have been discussed.
Reference28 articles.
1. Akerson, V. L., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in elementary classrooms: Research-based strategies for practical implementation. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 391-411.
2. Bissonnette, J. D. & Caprino, K. (2014). A call to action research: action research as an effective professional development model. Mid-Atlantic Education Review, 2(1), 11-22.
3. Department of Local Administration. (2018). Early childhood education standards. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Interior.
4. Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Ivanova, O., & Iliško, Dz. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the Anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157-179.
5. Giraud, F., & Saulpic, O. (2019). Research-based teaching or teaching-based research: Analysis of a teaching content elaboration process. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(4), 563-588.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献