Policy Views and Negative Beliefs About Vaccines in the United States, 2019

Author:

Stecula Dominik A.1,Kuru Ozan1,Albarracin Dolores1,Jamieson Kathleen Hall1

Affiliation:

1. At the time of the study, Dominik A. Stecula, Ozan Kuru, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson were with the Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Dominik A. Stecula was also with the Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC. Dolores Albarracin is with the Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign. Kathleen Hall Jamieson is also with the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether holding vaccine misconceptions, in the form of negative beliefs about vaccines, correlates with opposing governmental action at all levels designed to increase vaccination (e.g., removing personal belief and religious vaccine exemptions). Methods. Drawing on data from a nationally representative survey of 1938 US adults, we assessed the relation between negative beliefs about vaccines and provaccination policies. Results. Beyond sociodemographic and policy-relevant variables, such as gender and partisan affiliation, questionable negative beliefs about vaccines are the strongest predictor of opposition to policies designed to increase vaccination. Conclusions. Negative beliefs about vaccines in the general population may thwart the passage or implementation of policies designed to increase vaccination. Implementing strategies that reduce these negative beliefs should be a priority of educators and public health officials.

Publisher

American Public Health Association

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Origin Story Part II: Change in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement;Anti-Scientific Americans;2024-09-16

2. What’s Next, Doc?;Anti-Scientific Americans;2024-09-16

3. The Prevalence of Anti-Intellectual Attitudes;Anti-Scientific Americans;2024-09-16

4. Validating Two Approaches to Measuring Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement in Public-Opinion Surveys;Anti-Scientific Americans;2024-09-16

5. The Nature and Origins of Anti-Intellectualism;Anti-Scientific Americans;2024-09-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3