Predictors of Adjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at the Population Level

Author:

Kagedan D.J.,Dixon M.E.,Raju R.S.,Li Q.,Elmi M.,Shin E.,Liu N.,El-Sedfy A.,Paszat L.,Kiss A.,Earle C.C.,Mittmann N.,Coburn N.G.

Abstract

Background: In the present study, we aimed to describe, at the population level, patterns of adjuvant treatment use after curative-intent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCC) and to identify independent predictors of adjuvant treatment use. Methods: In this observational cohort study, patients undergoing PCC resection in the province of Ontario (population 13 million) during 2005–2010 were identified using the provincial cancer registry and were linked to administrative databases that include all treatments received and outcomes experienced in the province. Patients were defined as having received chemotherapy (CTX), chemoradiation (CRT), or observation (OBS). Clinicopathologic factors associated with the use of CTX, CRT, or OBS were identified by chi-square test. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of adjuvant treatment versus OBS, and CTX versus CRT. Results: Of the 397 patients included, 75.3% received adjuvant treatment (27.2% CRT, 48.1% CTX) and 24.7% received obs. Within a single-payer health care system with universal coverage of costs for CTX and CRT, substantial variation by geographic region was observed. Although the likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment increased from 2005 to 2010 (p = 0.002), multivariate analysis revealed widespread variation between the treating hospitals (p = 0.001), and even between high-volume hepatopancreatobiliary hospitals (p = 0.0006). Younger age, positive lymph nodes, and positive surgical resection margins predicted an increased likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment. Among patients receiving adjuvant treatment, positive margins and a low comorbidity burden were associated with CRT compared with CTX. Conclusions: Interinstitutional medical practice variation contributes significantly to differential patterns in the rate of adjuvant treatment for PCC. Whether such variation is warranted or unwarranted requires further investigation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3