Total Compared with Partial Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Assessment of Resection Margin, Readmission Rate, and Survival from the U.S. National Cancer Database

Author:

Passeri M.J.,Baker E.H.,Siddiqui I.A.,Templin M.A.,Martinie J.B.,Vrochides D.,Iannitti D.A.

Abstract

Introduction: Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has historically been associated with substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Given advancements in perioperative and postoperative care, evaluation of the surgical treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma should consider patient outcomes and long-term survival for total pancreatectomy compared with partial pancreatectomy. Methods: The U.S. National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing total pancreatectomy or partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma during 1998–2006. Demographics, tumour characteristics, operative outcomes, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, additional treatment, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared. Results: The database query returned 807 patients who underwent total pancreatectomy and 5840 who underwent partial pancreatectomy. More patients who underwent total pancreatectomy than a partial pancreatectomy had a margin-negative resection (p < 0.0001). Mortality and readmission rates were similar in the two groups, as was long-term survival on Kaplan–Meier curves (p = 0.377). A statistically significant difference in the rate of surgery only (without additional treatment) was observed for patients in the total pancreatectomy group (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: Although total compared with partial pancreatectomy was associated with a higher rate of margin-negative resection, median survival was not significantly different for patients undergoing either procedure. Patients who underwent total pancreatectomy were significantly less likely to receive adjuvant therapy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3