Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between total pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Hong Shengqian1ORCID,Ren Jiao2,Zhang Sufang1,Yan Yulou1,Liu Shiqi1,Qi Fuzhen1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Huaian China

2. Department of Radiology The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Huaian China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTo compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of total pancreatectomy (TP) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and to explore the safety and indications of TP.MethodsA systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from January 1943 to March 2023 for literatures comparing TP and PD in the treatment of PDAC. The primary outcome was postoperative overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included surgery time, blood loss, readmission, hospital stay, perioperative mortality, and overall morbidity. Fixed‐effect or random‐effect models were selected based on heterogeneity, and odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.ResultsA total of six studies involving 8396 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in OS after surgery between the two groups (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91–1.27; P = 0.38). The TP group had a longer surgery time (MD = 13.66, 95% CI: 4.57–22.75; P = 0.003) and more blood loss (MD = 133.17, 95% CI: 8.00–258.33; P = 0.04) than the PD group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: −2.04 to 2.22; P = 0.93), readmission rate (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.00–1.92; P = 0.05), perioperative mortality (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.98–1.69; P = 0.07), and overall morbidity (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.50–1.26; P = 0.33).ConclusionThe surgical process of TP is relatively complex, but there is no difference in short‐term clinical outcomes and OS compared to PD, making it a safe and reliable procedure. Indications and treatment outcomes for planned TP and salvage TP may differ, and more research is needed in the future for further classification and verification

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3