The CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering Programs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Rubrics for Evaluation of Three-Cycle Engineering Programs

Published:2019-11-01 Issue:10 Volume:28 Page:58-72
ISSN:2072-0459
Container-title:Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
language:
Short-container-title:Vysš. obraz. Ross. (Print)

Author:

Chuchalin A. I.¹

Affiliation:

1. Kuban State Technological University

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to propose Rubrics for self-evaluation of graduate and postgraduate engineering programs based on the FCDI (Forecast, Conceive, Design, Implement) Standards and FFCD (Foresight, Forecast, Conceive, Design) Standards by analogy with Rubrics for self-evaluation of undergraduate engineering programs based on the CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) Standards. The FCDI Standards and FFCD Standards were developed for Master’s and Doctoral engineering programs as a result of the CDIO approach evolution and by analogy with the CDIO Standards originally developed for Bachelor’s engineering programs. The CDIO/FCDI/FFCD Standards are recommended for the design and implementation of three-cycle engineering programs to train graduates for complex, innovative and research engineering activities, respectively, taking into account the features of the division of labor in the engineering profession. The 6-level scale Rubrics are helpful for evaluation the degree of Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctoral engineering programs compliance with the recommendations of the CDIO, FCDI and FFCD Standards, respectively.

Publisher

Moscow Polytechnic University

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Reference24 articles.

1. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition. Springer, 311 p.

2. Brodeur, D.R., Crawley, E.F. (2005). Program Evaluation Aligned with the CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the ASEE-2005, Portland, Oregon.

3. Worldwide CDIO Initiative. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/about

4. Antokhina J., Olenev, V., Sheynin, Y. (2016). CDIO Implementation Experience for the Masters Training at SUAI. In: Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2016, pp. 668-676. Available at: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522166104.pdf

5. Chuchalin, A.I. (2019). CDIO Standards Implementation and Further Development in Russia. In: E. Smirnova, R. Clark (Eds). Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context, pp. 80–88. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3395-5.ch008

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Best Practices of Engineering Training in World Leading Universities;University Management: Practice and Analysis;2021-05-01

2. Using of WorldSkills competitions for CDIO standards development in USURT;PROCEEDINGS OF THE SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TRANSPORT AND ENGINEERING (RTE 2021);2021

3. Evaluation of the Engineering Curriculum Elements for Compliance;Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia;2020-07-29

4. Priority Goals and Organization of Engineering Training at Russian Universities;Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia;2020-05-01