Evaluation of the Engineering Curriculum Elements for Compliance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of the Engineering Curriculum Elements for Compliance

Published:2020-07-29 Issue:7 Volume:29 Page:9-21
ISSN:2072-0459
Container-title:Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia
language:
Short-container-title:Vysš. obraz. Ross. (Print)

Author:

Chuchalin A. I.¹

Affiliation:

1. Kuban State Technological University

Abstract

Rubrics have been developed to evaluate the level of compliance of curriculum elements with the recommendations of the CDIO-FCDI-FFCD Standards in the process of modernizing engineering programs for undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate studies. As an example, the author presents the results of the evaluation of engineering undergraduate program courses for compliance with the recommendations of the CDIO Standards in the form of total and differentiated ratings of the modules of the humanities and social sciences, natural sciences and mathematics, basic engineering and specialized professional courses. Based on the ratings, the initial (before modernization) and planned (after modernization) levels of compliance of the program modules with the recommendations of each of the 12 CDIO Standards are determined. Using the rubrics enables to involve all the instructors in the process of engineering program modernization.

Publisher

Moscow Polytechnic University

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Reference24 articles.

1. Pereosmyslenie inzhenernogo obrazovaniya. Podkhod CDIO / E.F. Krouli, I. Malmkvist, S. Ostlund, D. R. Broder, K. Edstrem; per. s angl. S. Rybushkinoi; pod nauch. red. A. Chuchalina. M.: Izd. dom VShE, 2015. 504 s. [Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Edström, K. Rethinking Engineering Education, the CDIO Approach. Second Edition. Springer, 2014 (In Russ.)]

2. Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. Proceedings of 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, China.

3. Petrovskaya, T. (2013). Using CDIO Concept to Develop Engineering Education in Tomsk Polytechnic University. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, USA.

4. Vainshtein Yu.V., Shershneva V.A., Safonov K.V. Ideologiya CDIO v obuchenii matematike // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016. № 2. C. 75–82. [Vainshtein, Y., Shershneva, V., Safonov, K. (2016). CDIO Ideology in Math Training. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 2, pp. 75-82. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]

5. Gafurova N.V., Osipova S.I. Metallurgiche skoe obrazovanie na osnove ideologii CDIO // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2013. № 12. S. 137–139. [Gafurova, N., Osipova, S. (2013). Metallurgical Education based on CDIO Ideology. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. No. 12, pp. 137-139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)]