Affiliation:
1. University of Siegen
2. Kazan National Research Technological University, Tatarstan
Abstract
Any engineering activity is characterized by contradictions: social – between engineering problems and technical solutions and technological – between laws of nature and artificial engineering objects. This leads to the ethical dilemma of engineering work: when creating something new, social and environmental problems usually arise. This explains the “Janus-headedness” of the engineering profession: although the original intention is to do good, however, there are negative consequences that must be mitigated through new technical solutions that have the effect of creating improvements. “Leonardo’s oath” not only highlights this need, but also serves as a reference point for developing the engineering training programs which should be prepared specifically for this task. As a starting approach, the article suggests using the “sustainability triangle” – a model of social transformational effects in relation to the definition of the variables “social”, “economy” and “ecology” and their corresponding interdependence. It is shown that digitalization changes the “economy” setting in the sustainability triangle, which inevitably leads to consequences for the currently dependent variables “social “ and “ecology”. Digitalization requires, first, an economic approach, not environmental. It does not solve the fundamental problem: participation in the formation of a society to achieve socio-ecological balance is faced with the duality between the ethical necessity of forming and lack of real balance.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education
Reference13 articles.
1. FEANI position paper on Code of Conduct: Ethics and Conduct of Professional Engineers, approved by the FEANI GENERAL Assembly on 29 September 2006. Available at: https://www.feani.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Paper%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20Ethics.pdf (accessed 10.12.2020)
2. Dreher, R. (2015). A Benchmark for Curricula in Engineering Education: The Leonardic Oath. In: 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL). Florence, pp. 713-715, doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318117
3. Crawley, E.F., Malmquist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO-Approach. Springer International Publishing, 311 p., doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
4. Dreher, R. (2016). Der Leonardische Eid als Paradigma Ingenieurwissenschaftlicher Curricula: In: Kammasch, G; Dreher, R. Wie viel (Grundlagen) Wissen braucht technische Bildung? Wege zur technischen Bildung. Siegen, pp. 78-85, ISBN 978-3-9818728-0-4
5. Dreher, R., Gornov, A.O., Kondratyev, V.V. (2019). Concept of the Natural Structure of Engineering Education and the Code of Professional Ethics of an Engineer. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii= Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 76-85.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献